Cases 1 - 9 of 9
EZEKWO et al v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv17515
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO and CHUKWUEMEKA EZEKWO
Defendant:
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, ALAN BARATZ, MICHAEL MAGGIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ezekwo v. OPMC et al
as 1:2021cv05426
Defendant:
Director of Medical Staff, OPMC, DEA USA and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Ifeoma Ezekwo
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Laura Taylor Swain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
Ezekwo v. OPMC et al
as 1:2021cv01274
Plaintiff:
Dr. Ifeoma Ezekwo
Defendant:
Director of Medical Staff, City of Englewood and Englewood Police Department, Dara Govan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EZEKWO et al v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv01848
Defendant:
MICHAEL MAGGIANO, EMILY LYONS, JOSH MOSKOVITZ and others
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO and CHUKWUEMEKA EZEKWO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chukwuemeka Ezekwo, et al v. Christopher Quirk, et al
as 20-1728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IFEOMA EZEKWO and CHUKWUEMEKA EZEKWO
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, New Jersey, CHRISTOPHER QUIRK, THORNTON WHITE and others
EZEKWO et al v. QUIRK et al
as 2:2015cv03167
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUEMEKA EZEKWO and IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER QUIRK, MICHAEL CHRISTIANSEN, THORNTON WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regina Bailey v. Joseph Gibbons, et al
as 11-3868
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REGINA S. BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH G. GIBBONS, TANYA WOOD, DAVID WATKINS, Esq. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KELLY BURTON ROCCO, Esq.
Regina Bailey v. Joseph Gibbons, et al
as 11-3792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINA S. BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH G. GIBBONS, TANYA WOOD, DAVID WATKINS, Esq. and others
BAILEY v. GIBBONS et al
as 2:2009cv04119
Plaintiff:
REGINA S. BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GIBBONS, TANYA WOOD, DAVID WATKINS, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
