Cases 31 - 40 of 80
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Technicolor SA et al
as 2:2017cv02367
Plaintiff:
ABC Appliance, Inc., Edward Breivik, Christopher Donnelly and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc. and others
Unknown:
Molly McGrail Powers, Molly McGrail Powers and Molly McGrail Powers
Interested Party:
Toshiba America , Inc, Toshiba America Consumer Products, L.L.C., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15598
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant:
COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba America, Inc., et al
as 17-15597
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant:
LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN BARRY
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15496
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant:
FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA and LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Marta Cooperative of America, v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16982
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTA COOPERATIVE OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16427
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16400
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Movant - Appellant:
ANTHONY GIANASCA, GLORIA COMEAUX, MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and/or as Administrator of the Estate of the Late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16395
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant:
ELEANOR LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16399
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Movant - Appellant:
ANTHONY GIANASCA, GLORIA COMEAUX, MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and/or as Administrator of the Estate of the Late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr. and others
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16371
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant:
SEAN HULL and GORDON B. MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
