Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Lee Jones v. Tim McConahay
as 24-3786
Respondent: TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden and DOUGLAS FENDER, Warden
Petitioner: LEE JONES
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee: MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
barclay et al v. dixon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff: leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant: webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Ramal KeelerIn re: Ramal Keeler
as 23-3550
Petitioner: In re: RAMAL D. KEELER
Respondent: TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden
Hakeem SultaanaIn re: Hakeem Sultaana
as 22-3482
Petitioner: In re: HAKEEM SULTAANA
Respondent: TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden
Deandre Baskerville v. Tim McConahay
as 22-3427
Petitioner / Appellant: DEANDRE J. BASKERVILLE
Respondent / Appellee: TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden
Lonnie Thompson v. Tim McConahay
as 22-3412
Petitioner / Appellant: LONNIE THOMPSON
Respondent / Appellee: TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden
James Church v. Tim McConahay
as 22-3307
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES EDWARD CHURCH
Respondent / Appellee: TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden
Kevin Lawrence v. Tim McConahay
as 22-3123
Petitioner / Appellant: KEVIN LAWRENCE
Respondent / Appellee: TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden
Darryl Smith v. Tim McConahay
as 22-3014
Petitioner / Appellant: DARRYL SMITH
Respondent / Appellee: TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?