Cases
Susan Chen, et al v. Natalie D'Amico, et al
as 20-35241
Plaintiff: J. L., a minor, NAIXIANG LIAN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for L.L., a minor and L. L., a minor
Defendant: TIMOTHY EARWOOD, REDMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOM SOULE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUSAN CHEN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for J.L., a minor
Defendant / Appellee: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, KIMBERLY R. DANNER, in her individual capacity and official capacity as DSHS social worker, NATALIE D'AMICO, in her individual capacity and official capacity as a Redmond Police Department Officer and others
Naixiang Lian, et al v. Natlie D'Amico, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35118
Plaintiff: J. L., a minor, SUSAN CHEN and L. L., a minor
Defendant: TOM SOULE, JOHN DOES, A-D; E-H,, TIMOTHY EARWOOD and others
Defendant / Appellee: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, BILL MOSS, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Washington State Acting Secretary, KIMBERLY R. DANNER, in her individual capacity and official capacity as DSHS social worker and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NAIXIANG LIAN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for L.L., a minor
Susan Chen, et al v. Natalie D'Amico, et al
as 20-35119
Plaintiff: J. L., a minor, NAIXIANG LIAN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for L.L., a minor and L. L., a minor
Defendant: TIMOTHY EARWOOD, REDMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOM SOULE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUSAN CHEN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for J.L., a minor
Defendant / Appellee: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, KIMBERLY R. DANNER, in her individual capacity and official capacity as DSHS social worker, NATALIE D'AMICO, in her individual capacity and official capacity as a Redmond Police Department Officer and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?