Cases 81 - 90 of 175
Prado v. Rowley et al
as 3:2018cv00216
Defendant:
Harold Byrne, Quentin Byrne, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Sergio Prado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnny Hamilton v. Timothy Filson
as 18-71237
Petitioner:
JOHNNY EDWARD HAMILTON
Respondent:
TIMOTHY FILSON
Pough v. Filson et al
as 3:2018cv00191
Respondent:
Ely State Prison, Timothy Filson and Nevada Attorney General
Unknown:
Adam P. Laxalt, Adam P. Laxalt, Adam P. Laxalt and others
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jose v. Filson et al
as 3:2018cv00178
Defendant:
Timothy Filson and G. Martin
Plaintiff:
Edward Jose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Ray Hogan v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 18-99004
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY HOGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY FILSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Williams v. Filson et al
as 3:2018cv00189
Respondent:
Timothy Filson and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Kwauyshaun Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Filson et al
as 2:2018cv00740
Respondent:
Timothy Filson and Adam Paul Laxalt
Unknown:
Adam P. Laxalt and Adam P. Laxalt
Petitioner:
Donte Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Brown v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 18-15663
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY FILSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Teron Franklin v. State of Nevada, et al
as 18-15657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERON FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, GOVERNMENT, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Wilson v. Filson et al
as 3:2018cv00160
Respondent:
Timothy Filson and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Kyle Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
