Cases 81 - 90 of 109
Turpening v. Filson et al
as 3:2017cv00178
Defendant:
Baker, Byrnes, Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Turpening
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turpening v. Filson et al
as 2:2017cv00831
Defendant:
Baker, Byrnes, Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Turpening
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlsson v. Filson et al
as 3:2017cv00120
Petitioner:
Jeramie Carlsson
Respondent:
Timothy Filson and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Filson et al
as 2:2017cv00475
Respondent:
Timothy Filson and Adam Paul Laxalt
Petitioner:
Marlo Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deanda v. Bulfer et al
as 3:2017cv00080
Defendant:
Andrew Bulfer and Timothy Filson
Plaintiff:
Brian Deanda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
Shannon Carter
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Timothy Filson, Jerry Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Filson et al
as 3:2016cv00743
Respondent:
Timothy Filson and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Joaquin Broushon Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Filson et al
as 3:2016cv00694
Respondent:
Timothy Filson and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Joaquin Broushon Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Filson, et al
as 3:2016cv00644
Defendant:
Harold Byrne, Timothy Filson, M. Hartwick and others
Plaintiff:
Rickie L. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weidner v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv02301
Defendant:
Stacy Barrett, Greg Cox, Victor Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Weidner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
