Cases 1 - 10 of 175
Emil v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-3080
Petitioner:
RODNEY L. EMIL
Respondent:
WILLIAM GITTERE, ADAM PAUL LAXALT and TIMOTHY FILSON
Conners v. Filson, et al.
as 24-2170
Petitioner:
DARRELL CONNERS
Respondent:
TIMOTHY FILSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Torrez v. Filson et al
as 3:2023cv00159
Petitioner:
Richard Raymond Torrez
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Filson and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberto Durand v. Nevada, State of, et al
as 23-15280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA, STATE OF, terminated per #9 FAC, ELY STATE PRISON, terminated per #9 FAC, EXUM, Dr. terminated per #9 FAC and others
Alfonso Blake v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 23-15151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFONSO MANUEL BLAKE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, Party removed pursuant to Order No. 47, RICHARD SNYDER, [49] Suggestion of Death, WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, Substituted in for Warden Timothy Filson per ECF No. 34 Minute Order and others
Marty Fitzgerald v. Greg Martin, et al
as 23-15074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTY SCOTT FITZGERALD
Defendant / Appellee:
GREG MARTIN, LPN, TIMOTHY FILSON, Second Amended Complaint ECF No. 14, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Clyde Lewis v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 22-16547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE LEWIS, AKA Louis Randolph
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, Director, NDOC, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr., Warden, SDCC, MINOR ADAMS, Asst. Warden, SDCC and others
Douglas Shields v. Renee Baker, et al
as 22-15922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS E. SHIELDS
Defendant / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden, DWAYNE BAZE, TAMARA BRTEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.