Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Indiezone, Inc., et al v. Joe Rogness, et al
as 21-16338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INDIEZONE, INC.
Plaintiff:
EOBUY, LIMITED
Appellant:
CONOR FENNELLY and DOUGLAS RICHARD DOLLINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE ROGNESS, TODD ROOKE, PHIL HAZEL and others
Indiezone, Inc., et al v. Joe Rogness, et al
as 21-15344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INDIEZONE, INC.
Defendant:
CHRIS OHLSEN, TARGET STORES, INC., TONY ABENA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE ROGNESS and TODD ROOKE
Appellant:
CONOR FENNELLY and DOUGLAS RICHARD DOLLINGER
Plaintiff:
EOBUY, LIMITED
Conor Fennelly, et al v. Joe Rogness, et al
as 21-15094
Defendant:
CHRIS OHLSEN, TARGET STORES, INC., TONY ABENA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE ROGNESS and TODD ROOKE
Appellant:
CONOR FENNELLY and DOUGLAS RICHARD DOLLINGER
Plaintiff:
INDIEZONE, INC. and EOBUY, LIMITED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-16895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Indiezone, Inc., et al v. Todd Rooke, et al
as 14-16895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INDIEZONE, INC. and EOBUY, LIMITED
Appellant:
CONOR FENNELLY, CEO and DOUGLAS RICHARD DOLLINGER, Counsel
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD ROOKE, JOE ROGNESS, PHIL HAZEL and others
Indiezone, Inc., et al v. Todd Rooke, et al
as 14-16359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDIEZONE, INC. and EOBUY, LIMITED
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD ROOKE, JOE ROGNESS, PHIL HAZEL and others
Indiezone, Inc. et al v. Rooke et al
as 3:2013cv04280
Plaintiff:
Indiezone, Inc. and eoBuy, Limited
Defendant:
Todd Rooke, Joe Rogness, Phil Hazel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Naquin et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01634
Plaintiff:
Bryant A. Naquin , Velma C. Naquin , Brandon Anthony Newton and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
