Cases 11 - 20 of 297
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16081
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF BARBARA CALDWELL, ANTHONY GIANASCA, CAROLYN JORGENSEN and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-15704
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELEANOR LEWIS, Proposed Intervenor
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-15697
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Irico Group Corporation, et al
as 19-17428
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS and DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant:
SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC., SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellant:
IRICO GROUP CORPORATION and IRICO DISPLAY DEVICES CO., LTD.
Sockeye Licensing TX LLC v. Toshiba America, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01749
Defendant:
Toshiba America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sockeye Licensing TX LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv04879
Defendant:
Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Farris et al v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2018cv04186
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.), BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC individually and as successor-in-interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION) and others
Plaintiff:
MELVA FARRIS and GARY FARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Micron Technology, Inc.
as 18-1578
Defendant / Appellee:
SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING INTERNATIONAL (SHANGHAI) CORP., SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING INTERNATIONAL (BEIJING) CORPORATION, UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONE STAR SILICON INNOVATIONS LLC
Tech Data Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv06901
Defendant:
Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Shenzhen Seg Hitachi Color Display Devices, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, Jimmy Jahar Thule, Ramzi Yusef and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America v. Beazer East, Inc., et al
as 6:2017cv06785
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Beazer East, Inc., CBS Corporation, Chemung County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
