Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Lundy v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Rossi Byron Lundy, Jr.
Defendant:
Tracy Johnson, Steve Warner, Michael Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Gooden v. Tracy Johnson
as 2:2024cv02648
Petitioner:
Anthony Gooden
Respondent:
Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Potter v. St. Charles County, et al
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Potter
Defendant:
St. Charles County, St. Charles County Prosecuting Attorney Office, St. Charles County Counselor's Office and others
(HC) Haynes v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00581
Petitioner:
Leland Haynes
Respondent:
Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steven Aguilar v. The People of the State of California et al
as 2:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
Steven Aguilar
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Gooden v. Johnson
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gooden
Defendant:
Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gooden v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gooden
Defendant:
Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tommy Cole v. Tracy Johnson
as 2:2023cv10913
Petitioner:
Tommy Cole
Respondent:
Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lundy v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Rossi Byron Lundy, Jr.
Defendant:
Tracy Johnson, Steve Warner, Michael Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. St. Charles County et al
as 4:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Potter
Defendant:
St. Charles County, St. Charles County Prosecuting Attorney Office, St. Charles County Counselor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
