Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Rust v. United States Automobile Association et al
as 4:2024cv00359
Defendant:
United States Automobile Association, Edward Schlitz, Kathleen Schlitz and others
Plaintiff:
Jan C Rust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gamino v. Schrouder et al
as 4:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Gamino
Defendant:
Faith Schrouder, David Hill and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JORDAN v. TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
JAMES JORDAN
Defendant:
TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braaksma v. Tucson Police Department
as 4:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Roxanna Lee Braaksma
Defendant:
Tucson Police and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department, Arizona, State of, Toni Hellon and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00595
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peltz v. Guinee et al
as 4:2019cv00418
Defendant:
Michael A Kisbaugh, Eric P Hatch, Christopher Hale and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon Edward Peltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Guinee et al
as 4:2019cv00415
Defendant:
Michael A Kisbaugh, Eric P Hatch, Christopher Hale and others
Plaintiff:
Mark David Brown
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Vernon Edward Peltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patricia Bauerle v. Patricia Bauerle, et al
as 17-15544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA BAUERLE
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA BAUERLE, GREGORY A. SMITH, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Bauerle v. Bauerle et al
as 4:2016cv00614
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bauerle
Defendant:
Patricia Bauerle, Gregory A Smith, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
