Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 14-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM REECE, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, DIANE REECE, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, HERMAN TOLBERT, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, AES SHADY POINT, a Delaware Corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 14-7010
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIELDS OPERATING, INC., an Arkansas corporation, STEPHENS PRODUCTION COMPANY, an Arkansas corporation, BRAZIL CREEK MINERALS, INC., an Oklahoma corporation and others
Defendant:
BISHOP TRUCKING, an Oklahoma corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENNETT TANKSLEY, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, CHARLES TACKETT, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, HERMAN TOLBERT, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages and others
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 13-604
Petitioner:
WILLIAM REECE, DIANE REECE, HERMAN TOLBERT and others
Respondent:
AES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, AES SHADY POINT, a Delaware Corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 13-604
Respondent:
HANNA OIL & GAS COMPANY, an Arkansas corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ENERVEST OPERATING, LLC and others
Petitioner:
DIANE REECE, WILLIAM REECE, SUSAN HOLMES and others
Reece et al v. AES Corporation et al
as 6:2012cv00457
Defendant:
Star Bulk, MMHF, LLC, SEECO, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Reece, Bennett Tanksley, Charles Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
