Cases 91 - 100 of 202
Anderson v. Showalter et al
as 1:2014cv00330
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson
Defendant:
Mary L. Showalter, M.C. Garman, Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. BICKELL et al
as 5:2014cv01021
Petitioner:
RUSHAWN MATTHEWS
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PAYNE v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2014cv00171
Petitioner:
CHARLES PHILLIP PAYNE
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL and THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Bickell et al
as 1:2014cv00213
Petitioner:
Rushawn Matthews
Respondent:
Tabb Bickell and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Bickell et al
as 1:2014cv00110
Petitioner:
Andre Lamont Jackson
Respondent:
Tabb Bickell and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NEWELL v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2014cv00553
Petitioner:
PAUL NEWELL
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2014cv00251
Petitioner:
TAVRON SMITH
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mobley v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2014cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gerry Mobley, Jr.
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, Traci Parkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHELPS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00047
Petitioner:
RICHARD PHELPS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRUZ v. BICKELL
as 2:2014cv00056
Petitioner:
GERMAN CRUZ
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
