Cases 31 - 40 of 201
Butler, et al v. Wetzel, et al
as 20-3116
Defendant:
BRUCE EWELL, WILLIAM S. WALTERS, Current Deputy Superintendent for Centralized Services at SCI-Huntingdon, ANTHONY E. EBERLING, Security Lt. at SCI-Huntingdon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARIFF BUTLER and JEREMEY MELVIN
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN KAUFFMAN
WILLIAMS v. NYBERG et al

as 1:2020cv00208
Defendant:
R. ROSCINSKI, CO HARMON, CINDY CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Walker et al v. Digby et al

as 3:2020cv00762
Defendant:
Jen Digby, Howdy Shell, Jody Fognani and others
Plaintiff:
William Walker, Cameron Lovett, Dwayne Gooden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClenton et al v. Wetzel et al

as 1:2020cv00681
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Michael Wenerowicz, Tabb Bickell and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McClenton and Mumia Abu-Jamal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pew v. Wetzel et al

as 1:2020cv00668
Defendant:
Shawn P Kenny, Dorina Varner, Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler et al v. Wetzel et al

as 4:2019cv02171
Defendant:
Lonnie Oliver, Dorina Varner, J. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremey Melvin and Shariff Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martz v. Wetzel et al

as 3:2019cv01965
Plaintiff:
Zachery Martz
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Supt. DelBalso and Tabb Bickell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. DRISCOLL et al
as 3:2019cv00143
Defendant:
JOEL BARROWS, DAVID CLOSE, SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMTIH and others
Plaintiff:
ARNELL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Greg Johnson v. Darrell Wireman, et al

as 19-1968
Defendant / Appellee:
ULRICH KLEMM, DARRELL WIREMAN, SHAWN KEPHART and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREG JOHNSON
SIMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01443
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE CURRIAN and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE LEE SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.