Cases 41 - 50 of 201
Lane et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Michael Wenerowicz, Caleb Younker, Kenneth Goodman and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan White and Carlton Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wetzel et al

as 4:2018cv02352
Defendant:
Rex Wertz, Sipple, James Barnackle and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02099
Plaintiff:
Davon R. Hayes
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennsylvania Institutional Law Project et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02100
Plaintiff:
Abolitionist Law Center, Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Institutional Law Project and others
Defendant:
Shirley Moore Smeal, Tabb Bickell, John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travillion v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al

as 1:2018cv02075
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe #1, Mr. FNU Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRINGER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv00648
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STRINGER
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, TABB BICKELL, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boozer v. Bickell et al
as 1:2018cv00893
Plaintiff:
Henry Boozer
Defendant:
Tabb Bickell, Michael Wenerowicz and Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. SCI-Huntingdon et al

as 3:2018cv00805
Plaintiff:
Charles Martin
Defendant:
SCI-HUNTINGDON, Tabb Bickell, Pa Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREWS v. WETZEL et al

as 3:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
DAVID CREWS
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SHIRLEY M. SMEALS, TABB BICKELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagan et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv00270
Plaintiff:
Damont Hagan, Raphael Spearman and Thomas Davis
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Smeal, Tabb Bickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.