Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HALL v. USA
as 5:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
TAMARA HALL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HALL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv18710
Plaintiff:
TAMARA HALL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
KENNEDY v. GILLIS et al
as 4:2018cv00185
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Supt. Emmitt L. Sparkman, Roger Wruck and others
Plaintiff:
SOLOMAN STEVE KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KENNEDY v. GILLIS et al
as 1:2018cv01810
Defendant:
PHIL BRYANT, ROGER WRUCK, PELICIA HALL and others
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON STEVE KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Bryant et al
as 1:2017cv07880
Petitioner:
Soloman S. Kennedy
Respondent:
Phil Bryant and Tamara Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kennedy v. Bryant et al
as 4:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Soloman S. Kennedy
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Haley Barabour, Tamara Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Bryant et al
as 1:2017cv07140
Plaintiff:
Soloman S Kennedy
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Haley Barabour, Tamara Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02004
Plaintiff:
Jason Jacobs , Anthony Shuler , Jenero Brice and others
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company , Janssen Research & Development LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
