Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Stone #489704 v. Perry et al
as 1:2010cv00423
Plaintiff:
Rubin Lamont Stone #489704
Defendant:
Gloria M. Perry, Unknown Abdellatif, Claire Vander Velden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Broyles v. Correctional Medical Services,, et al
as 10-1447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY LEE BROYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., named as Correctional Medical Service, Inc., C. PEROG, Medical Secretary, TAMERLA HAMILTON and others
Simpson #184722 v. Prison Health Services et al
as 1:2009cv01064
Plaintiff:
Richard James Simpson #184722
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Patricia Caruso, George Pramstaller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00392
Plaintiff:
Yvette Jones
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Craig Hutchinson, Dennis Straub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ricky Broyles v. Correctional Medical Services,, et al
as 08-1638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY LEE BROYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., named as Correctional Medical Service, Inc., C. PEROG, Medical Secretary, TAMERLA HAMILTON and others
Broyles #213702 v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00690
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Broyles #213702
Defendant:
Tamerla Hamilton, Amy Meyer and John Doe
Cause Of Action: O
Simpson v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 2:2007cv12609
Plaintiff:
Richard Simpson
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Patricia Caruso, George Pramstaller and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Whitfield #204557 v. Whalen et al
as 1:2007cv00399
Plaintiff:
Daniel Whitfield #204557
Defendant:
Michael Whalen, Todd Hix, William Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
