Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Hitel Technologies LLC v. Tapestry, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Hitel Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Tapestry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tapestry, Inc. et al v. Hye E-Commerce USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv07449
Plaintiff:
Tapestry, Inc., Coach Services, Inc. and Coach IP Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Hye E-Commerce USA, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Tapestry, Inc. et al v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2021cv01636
Plaintiff:
Tapestry, Inc. and Kate Spade, LLC
Defendant:
Michelle Sandoval and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Leonard v. Tapestry Inc
as 4:2021cv01097
Plaintiff:
Astrid Leonard
Defendant:
Tapestry Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tapestry, Inc. v. Factory Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv01941
Plaintiff:
Tapestry, Inc.
Defendant:
Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JPT Group, LLC v. Stuart Weitzman LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01919
Defendant:
Tapestry, Inc., Stuart Weitzman Inc, Stuart Weitzman Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JPT Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Pekin Insurance Company v. Linda's Food Market, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv03292
Defendant:
Coach IP Holdings, LLC, Linda's Food Market, LLC, Ahmad Alwawi and others
Plaintiff:
Pekin Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Purcell et al v. Tapestry, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00250
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Kate Spade LLC, Tapestry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Edward James Purcell and Deanna Purcell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Soleimani et al v. Andonian et al
as 1:2021cv01018
Respondent:
Bergi Andonian and Renaissance Carpet & Tapestries, Inc.
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Soleimani and Jan Soleimani
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
