Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
USA, et al v. Tata Consultancy Services, LTD
as 24-7032
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Anil Kini and Anil Kini
Defendant:
Tata Consultancy Services, LTD
Moises Ross v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd et al
as 2:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Moises Ross
Defendant:
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3320
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Crockett v. TATA Consultancy Services, LTD.
as 2:2022cv04310
Plaintiff:
Gary Crockett
Defendant:
TATA Consultancy Services, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Subramanian v. Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.
as 0:2021cv01613
Plaintiff:
Senthil Kumar Subramanian
Defendant:
Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. and Tata America International Corp. a New York Corporation doing business as TCS America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
