Cases 1 - 10 of 167
TEASLEY v. GREEN MTN. CONCERT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
ERIC TEASLEY
Defendant:
GREEN MTN. CONCERT SERVICES, INC., RED HAWK PROTECTION SOLUTIONS, LLC, JOHN DOES (1 10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
TEASLEY v. O'BRIEN
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Defendant:
ELIZABETH O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenya Teasley v. David Hoke
as 24-1101
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Defendant:
DAVID FRED HOKE, AUDREY TURNLEY and JUDGE ORLANDO HUDSON
TEASLEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv22447
Plaintiff:
JOHN TEASLEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TEASLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32036
Plaintiff:
MARIO TEASLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TEASLEY v. HANSEN et al
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Defendant:
SUZANNE HANSEN, BARBARA GIBSON and RUSSELL EUBANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teasley v. O'Neal et al
as 5:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Kenya Teasley
Defendant:
Tasha O'Neal and F. Blair Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Headrick v. Chitwood et al
as 2:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Nathan David Headrick
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Chitwood and Nurse Teasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headrick v. Chitwood et al
as 4:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Nathan David Headrick
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Chitwood and Nurse Teasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
