Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wireless Protocol Innovations, Inc. v. TCL Corporation et al
as 8:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Wireless Protocol Innovations, Inc. and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Defendant:
TCL Corporation, TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited, TCT Mobile US Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc and ZTE (TX) Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom
Counter Claimant:
TCT Mobile (US) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01366
Consolidated Defendant:
Wistron InfoComm Technology (America) Corp., TPV Electronics (Fujian) Co. Ltd., Wistron InfoComm Technology (Texas) Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Personalized Media Communications, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom, Edward A Infante and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 6:2009cv00203
Plaintiff:
Fractus, S.A.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Research Institute, LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., Personal Communications Devices Holdings, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
V Bryan Medlock, Jr, Robert W Faulkner and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00269
Defendant:
Google Inc., Match.Com LLC, Softlayer Technologies, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Red Hat, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC
Undetermined:
Hesha Abrams, Robert W Faulkner and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Motion Games, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al
as 6:2012cv00878
Not Classified By Court:
Richard Grainger and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Plaintiff:
Motion Games, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Nintendo Co., Ltd. and Rent-A-Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Nintendo of America, Inc., Retro Studios, Inc. and GameStop Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Intuitive Building Controls, Inc. v. AMX LLC
as 2:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
Intuitive Building Controls, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., Acuity Brands, Inc. and Control4 Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Gary V McGowan, David Folsom and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Crestron Electronics, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
WI-Lan, Inc.
Defendant:
AMX LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Phenix, LLC v. Integrated Memory Logic, Ltd. et al
as 6:2015cv00436
Not Classified By Court:
Jeff Kaplan and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Plaintiff:
Phenix, LLC
Defendant:
Integrated Memory Logic, Ltd., Exar Corporation and Integrated Memory Logic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
DataQuill Limited v. Huawei Technologies Co LTD et al
as 2:2013cv00633
Not Classified By Court:
Jeff Kaplan, Hesha Abrams and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Plaintiff:
DataQuill Limited
Defendant:
Huawei Technologies Co LTD, Huawei Device Co., Ltd., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc.
Intervenor:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Kellan Restaurant Management Corp. d/b/a 54th Street Grill & Bar
as 2:2012cv00761
Not Classified By Court:
James W. Knowles and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Plaintiff:
DietGoal Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Kellan Restaurant Management Corp
Consolidated Defendant:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc., Marco's Franchising, LLC and others
Consolidated 3Rd Party Defendant:
Struck, Inc.
Petitioner:
CHICK-FIL-A, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Patent Harbor, LLC v. Audiovox Corporation et al
as 6:2010cv00361
Defendant:
Onkyo USA Corporation, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., DPI, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
James W Knowles, Hesha Abrams, Gary Kitchen and others
Plaintiff:
Patent Harbor, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
