Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Li v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv06791
Plaintiff:
Wentao Li
Defendant:
US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Settles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ted Settles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Rapp v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv02772
Plaintiff:
Ted Rapp
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(SS) Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00270
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ted Charles Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(SS) Clarke v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv02360
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ted Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clarke v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020at01170
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ted Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Metzger, Ted v. Saul, Andrew
as 3:2019cv00694
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Ted Metzger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kelso v. Saul
as 1:2019cv02824
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Ted Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rall v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv01144
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Ted E. Rall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Owens v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv03013
Plaintiff:
Ted Owens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
