Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Olmos #196384 v. Copciac et al
as 3:2024cv08048
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Olmos
Defendant:
Amanda Copciac, Jocelyn Myers, Jeff Gallimore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hesswany et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Aiman Hesswany, Valantina Nissan and George Hesswany
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Muhit v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Omer Faruk Muhit
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Brisco et al
as 2:2023mc00004
Defendant:
Fredirick Safranko, Marucs Todd Brisco, Yas Castellum LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Receiver:
Kelly Crawford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
