Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Hollis Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, et al
as 24-1318
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP), Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities, Cal Ludeman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities and others
Hollis Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, et al
as 23-2319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP), Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities., Cal Ludeman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities. and others
Hollis Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, et al
as 23-1140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP), Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities., Cal Ludeman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities. and others
Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the et al
as 0:2013cv01074
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman and others
Yazzie et al v. Moser et al
as 0:2012cv00399
Plaintiff:
Lionel Tohannie Yazzie, William Edward Will, Jr., Wesley Elmer Wills and others
Defendant:
Kevin Moser, Elizabeth Barbo, Scott Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krych v. DHS MSOP-ML, April 6, 2011, Client Placement Committee members and participants et al
as 0:2011cv03091
Plaintiff:
Chris Krych
Defendant:
DHS MSOP-ML, April 6, 2011, Client Placement Committee members and participants, Kent Johansen, Barbara Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
