Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Doni Anderson v. Kenneth Nelson
as 23-6979
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONI TERRELE ANDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
MR. KENNETH NELSON, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Anderson v. Nelson
as 2:2022cv01032
Petitioner:
Doni Terrele Anderson
Respondent:
Mr. Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Terrell Anderson
as 21-4576
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRELL ANDERSON
Sagaille v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv05236
Plaintiff:
Chrismy Sagaille
Defendant:
P.O. Marc Starromand, City of New York, Sgt. Kiada Moragne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sagaille v. Anderson et al
as 1:2019cv04352
Plaintiff:
CHRISMY SAGAILLE
Defendant:
TERRELL ANDERSON, KIADA MORAGNE, P.O. Marc Starromand and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Allegis Investment Advisors et al
as 2:2019cv00079
Garnishee:
XL America, XL Catlin, Indian Harbor Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
James Bret Mack, Terrell Anderson, Carl Leroy Wagner and others
Defendant:
Allegis Investment Advisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Terrell Anderson v. Cook County Board, et al
as 17-2188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRELL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COOK COUNTY BOARD, TONI PRECKWINKLE, THOMAS DAVY, Judge and others
OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. Anderson et al
as 4:2016cv00368
Defendant:
Terrell Anderson, Betty Stokes and Charles Mims
Plaintiff:
OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Atrium 5 Limited v. Hossain et al
as 6:2016cv01964
Plaintiff:
Atrium 5 Limited
Defendant:
Mohammad Hossain, Reedh Food Mart, Inc., Terrell Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
