Cases 1 - 10 of 16
James et al v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv02811
Plaintiff:
Terrell James, Anice Terrell and James Terrell
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation and The Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Robey v. Sanders
as 3:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Terrell James Robey
Defendant:
Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBEY v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
TERRELL JAMES ROBEY
Defendant:
DAVIS and SWAG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robey v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Terrell James Robey
Defendant:
Davis, Goodwin, Swag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Cuny-John Jay College
as 21-2882
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrell James
Defendant / Appellee:
Neil Stewart, in their official capacities and Susan Jeffrey, in their official capacities
Defendant:
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, Rajendra Singh, Director of Human Resources and in their official capacities, Donald V. Gray, Director, Office of Legal Counsel and in their official capacities and others
Littlejohn v. Crow
as 21-5060
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRELL JAMES LITTLEJOHN, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW
GRANT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28827
Plaintiff:
GRANT and TERRELL JAMES GRANT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Cpl Markel Polk et al
as 9:2020cv00938
Plaintiff:
Willis Terrell James
Defendant:
Patricia Ray and Cpl Markel Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00644
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Littlejohn v. Allbaugh
as 4:2018cv00477
Petitioner:
Terrell James Littlejohn, Sr
Respondent:
Joe Allbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
