Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wilder v. Evers et al
as 5:2024hc02059
Petitioner:
Lawrence Verline Wilder
Respondent:
Administrator Evers, Ed McMahon, Benjamin David and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURRS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BURRS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SEYFARTH SHAW LLP, CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Meyers v. Chief Judge et al
as 5:2022ct03011
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Chief Judge, James N. Ishida, Judge Terrence Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witham v. Boyle et al
as 5:2020cv00446
Defendant:
The GSA, New York State, State of Vermont and others
Plaintiff:
Judson Witham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witham v. Boyle et al
as 5:2020cv00330
Defendant:
The GSA, Terrence Boyle, New York State and others
Plaintiff:
Judson Witham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOYLE v. PUBLISHERS CLEARING HOUSE et al
as 1:2020cv00834
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE BOYLE, TER BOYLE and T. BAYLIETH
Defendant:
JOHN CROSS, BRIAN VALLENTINE and PUBLISHERS CLEARING HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witham v. Boyle et al
as 5:2019cv00260
Plaintiff:
Judson Witham
Defendant:
Terrence Boyle, The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, New York State and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SMITH v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2018cv00618
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant:
TERRENCE BOYLE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and JOSHUA A. STEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broughton v. The United States Bankruptcy Court et al
as 5:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
Celeste G. Broughton
Defendant:
The United States Bankruptcy Court and Terrence Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Britt et al
as 5:2016ct03211
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
W. Earl Britt, James C. Fox, James C. Dever, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
