Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Brownlee v. People of the State of California
as 23-3298
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRENCE BROWNLEE
Respondent / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
(HC) Brownlee v. People of the State of California
as 1:2023cv01013
Petitioner:
Terrence Brownlee
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrence Brownlee v. Board of Prison Terms
as 23-15829
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRENCE BROWNLEE
Respondent / Appellee:
BOARD OF PRISON TERMS
Brownlee v. People of the State of California
as 3:2023cv01391
Plaintiff:
Terrence Brownlee
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Brownlee v. People of the State of CA
as 2:2023cv00258
Petitioner:
Terrence Brownlee
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brownlee v. Board of Prison Terms
as 3:2022cv04693
Petitioner:
Terrence Brownlee
Respondent:
Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milton et al v. Patterson et al
as 4:2021cv08545
Plaintiff:
William Milton, Shelton Adams, Robert Blackwell and others
Petitioner:
William Pardue
Defendant:
Ronald R. Patterson, State of California, Craig Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brownlee v. Rubaicaba et al
as 3:2019cv06111
Defendant:
J. Trurett, Saint-Louis, G. Gash and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Brownlee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brownlee v. Lam et al
as 3:2016cv07048
Plaintiff:
Terrence Brownlee
Defendant:
P. Lam, S. Posson, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrence Brownlee v. Stanley Boone, et al
as 16-16444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRENCE BROWNLEE
Defendant - Appellee:
STANLEY A. BOONE, ARLAN HARRELL and FRESNO COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
