Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Muhammad v. Workman et al
as 6:2012cv00094
Plaintiff:
Abdullah L.R. Muhammad
Defendant:
Randall Workman, Terry Crenshaw and Bob Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Workman, et al
as 12-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB BARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, DEBBIE MORTON, Deputy Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, CHAD BROWN, Case Worker, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and others
Phillips-Bey v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Phillips-Bey
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Dennis Cotner, Genese McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dopp v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv01495
Plaintiff:
Richard L Dopp
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Johnny Blevins, Randy Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Workman et al
as 6:2011cv00423
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Randy Workman, Debbie Morton, Chad Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Scott et al
as 6:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Victor Cornell Miller
Defendant:
Wade Scott, Robert Compton, D. D. Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Orman et al
as 5:2011cv01031
Plaintiff:
Antone L A Knox
Defendant:
David Orman, Michael Oakley, Craig Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dopp v. Jones, et al
as 11-6207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LYNN DOPP
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, JOHNNY BLEVINS, IA Administrator, RANDY KNIGHT, IA Officer and others
Knox v. Sockey, et al
as 11-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Berryhill v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv00307
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Randall G Workman, Linda Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
