Cases 31 - 40 of 275
Tyler v. Ryan et al
as 4:2010cv00353
Petitioner:
Jason Ray Tyler
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maisano v. Mulcahey et al
as 4:2010cv00346
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Unknown Mulcahey, Stephen M McNamee, Raner C Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Ryan et al
as 4:2010cv00343
Petitioner:
Dale Maisano
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maisano v. Collins et al
as 4:2010cv00341
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Raner C Collins, Stephen M McNamee, Charles Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Ryan et al
as 4:2010cv00340
Petitioner:
Dale Maisano
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arthur Coleman v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Offi, et al
as 10-16292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Sheriff, UNKNOWN PARTY, Deputy Sheriff B.3229 and others
Maisano v. Ryan et al
as 4:2010cv00335
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Jan Brewer, Terry Goddard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delmo Torrefranca v. Terry Goddard, et al
as 10-16192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELMO FIGURA TORREFRANCA
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General at Attorney General Office, RANDALL M. HOWE, Chief Counsel at Criminal Appeals Section, RICHARD M. ROMLEY, Maricopa County Attorney at Maricopa County Attorney's Office and others
Maisano v. Robertson et al
as 4:2010cv00304
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
David W Robertson, Charles Ryan, Jan Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Canteen Correctional Services et al
as 4:2010cv00303
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Canteen Correctional Services, Charles Ryan, Jan Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
