Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,101
Caraffa #350727 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv01690
Defendant: Arizona, State of, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, United States of America and others
Plaintiff: Alfred Erika Caraffa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rusby Aguilar-Hernandez, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-2427
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner: Rusby Dionisia Aguilar-Hernandez and J.A.A.
State of Texas v. Bureau of Alcohol
as 24-10612
Plaintiff: State of Mississippi, State of Texas, Tennessee Firearms Association and others
Defendant: United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Merrick Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22580
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Emad Samir Rezk Ayad v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-2165
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner: EMAD SAMIR REZK AYAD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22541
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22512
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05549
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05548
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mamady Keita v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-2343
Petitioner: Mamady Kalifa Keita
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?