Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-820
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Phoenix Light SF Limited v. The Bank of New York Mellon Co
as 22-239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Phoenix Light SF Limited, in its own right and the right of Blue Heron Funding V Ltd., Blue Heron Funding VI Ltd., Blue Heron Funding VII Ltd., Blue Heron Funding IX Ltd., Kleros Preferred Funding V Plc, Silver Elms CDO PLC, Silver Elms CDO II Limite, C-Bass CBO XIV Ltd., and each of Blue Heron Funding V. Ltd., Blue Heron Funding VI Ltd., Blue Heron Funding VII Ltd., Bluer Heron Funding IX Ltd., Kleros Preferred Funding V Plc, Silver Elms CDO Plc, Silver Elms CDO II Limited, in their own right and others
Defendant / Appellee:
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee
Castro v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 20-1928
Defendant / Appellee:
The Bank of New York Mellon, As trustee for the certificate holders of CWalt Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-0A11 mortgage pass through certificates, series 2006-OA11, FKA The Bank of New York, All co-defendants that are known and unknown and Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mario E. Castro
Castro v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 20-567
Defendant / Appellee:
The Bank of New York Mellon, As trustee for the certificate holders of CWalt Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-0A11 mortgage pass through certificates, series 2006-OA11, FKA The Bank of New York, All co-defendants that are known and unknown and Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mario E. Castro
Valle v. Bank of New York Mellon
as 19-2648
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nelson Valle
Defendant / Appellee:
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee Certificate Holder of CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificate Holders, Servies 2005-4, FKA The Bank of New York and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee on Behalf of Cit Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-1 v. Thurairaj
as 7:2018cv09823
Defendant:
John Thurairaj
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee on Behalf of Cit Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Knowles et al v. Louzon et al
as 1:2017cv09206
Plaintiff:
Harold D. Knowles and Wilbert H. Knowles
Defendant:
Amit Louzon, Bayview Loans Servicing, LLC, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Retirement Board Of The Police v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-1776
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Retirement Board Of The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago, on Behalf of Itself and Similarly Situated Certificate Holders, Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
The Bank of New York Mellon,, as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements
Retirement Board Of The Police v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-661
Petitioner-Cross-Respondent:
Retirement Board Of The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago, (on Behalf of Itself and Similarly Situated Certificate Holders), Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System and others
Respondent-Cross-Petitioner:
The Bank of New York Mellon, (as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements)
Retirement Board of the Police v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-664
Petitioner-Cross-Respondent:
The Bank of New York Mellon, (as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements)
Respondent-Cross-Petitioner:
Retirement Board Of The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago, (on Behalf of Itself and Similarly Situated Certificate Holders), Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
