Cases 1 - 10 of 380
Lewis v. City of Columbus, Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
Estate of Donovan L. Lewis
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Ohio and Chief Elaine Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Buffalo, et al. v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc., et al.
as 24-2350
Plaintiff:
CITY OF CINCINNATI, CITY OF CLEVELAND, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Defendant:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC. and KIA MOTOR AMERICA, INC
Simmons v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv01550
Plaintiff:
Sierra Simmons
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Chase W. Rogers and Randall C. Beam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saulsbery v. City of Columbus
as 2:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
Vernon Saulsbery
Defendant:
City of Columbus
Debose v. DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Rashad Debose
Defendant:
DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.
Petitioner:
City of Columbus and Lara Baker-Morrish
Debose v. DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.,
as 2:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Rashad Debose
Defendant:
DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.,
Petitioner:
City of Columbus and Lara Baker-Morrish
Fisher v. Kissee et al
as 2:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
Jaylen Fisher
Defendant:
Officer Grady Kissee, City of Columbus, Columbus Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Buffalo, et al. v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc., et al.
as 24-739
Respondent:
CITY OF BUFFALO, CITY OF CINCINNATI, CITY OF CLEVELAND and others
Petitioner:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC. and KIA MOTOR AMERICA, INC
Fisher v. Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Sally Fisher
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Andrew Ginther, Ned Pettus, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Moore et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dymon Moore and Gassey Williams
Defendant:
The City of Columbus and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
