Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Maehren et al v. City of Kirkland et al
as 2:2024cv00532
Petitioner: Daniel and Angela Maehren, Ray and Susan Carr and Ariji Ganguly
Respondent: City of Kirkland, 12708 NE 7th LLC, Adam Weinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson et al v. City of Kirkland et al
as 2:2023cv00801
Plaintiff: Stephen Anderson and Solx Corporation
Defendant: City of Kirkland, City of Bellevue and City of Sammamish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brian Goertz, et al v. City of Kirkland, et al
as 22-36021
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIAN GOERTZ and BENSON MAXWELL LLC
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF KIRKLAND, ADAM WEINSTEIN, Planning and Building Director and DAVID BARNES, Senior Planner
Anderson et al v. City of Kirkland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01722
Plaintiff: Stephen Anderson
Defendant: City of Kirkland and City of Bellevue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Goertz et al v. City of Kirkland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00208
Defendant: Adam Weinstein, David Barnes, City of Kirkland, Washington and others
Plaintiff: Benson Maxwell, LLC, Brian Goertz and Benson Maxwell LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Boston, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-72749
Petitioner: CITY OF PIEDMONT, California, HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, Maryland and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
City of Kirkland v. Endo Health Solutions Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00388
Defendant: Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: Kirkland City of and City of Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Mathewson et al v. City of Kirkland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01705
Plaintiff: Kirk Mathewson, ANV LLC, Thatcher Mathewson and others
Defendant: City of Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
City of Portland, Oregon, et al v. USA, et al
as 19-72391
Petitioner: SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION, MT. HOOD CABLE REGULATORY COMMISSION, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner: COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor: CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?