Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Coleman v. The City of Norfolk, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Defendant:
Leandra Mae Tanner, The City of Norfolk, Virginia, Robert Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Anderson v. The City of Norfolk, Virginia
as 2:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Anna Anderson
Defendant:
The City of Norfolk, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Amanda Mayes v. City of Norfolk, Virginia
as 23-1840
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMANDA R. MAYES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
Paton v. City Of Norfolk, Virginia et al
as 2:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
KATHY B PATON and Kathy B. Paton
Defendant:
Virginia City Of Norfolk, JOHN DOE and City of Norfolk, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Oates Food Services II, LLC v. City Council of the City of Norfolk, Virginia
as 2:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Oates Food Services II, LLC
Defendant:
City Council of the City of Norfolk, Virginia, in its official capacity, Kenneth Cooper Alexander, Martin A. Thomas, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
McBride v. City of Norfolk, Virginia
as 2:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
Robert McBride
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Mayes v. City of Norfolk, Virginia
as 2:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Amanda R Mayes
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, Virginia
Karen Baka v. City of Norfolk, Virginia
as 21-1957
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREN BAKA, a/k/a Karen Baka-Branchesi
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
