Cases 1 - 10 of 1,681
Nardone v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
as 0:2023cv60578
Plaintiff:
Diane Nardone
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Bouldrey v. Techtronic Industries of North America Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Bouldrey
Defendant:
Techtronic Industries of North America Inc and The Home Depot Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Catina v. Rust-Oleum Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Michael Catina
Defendant:
Rust-Oleum Corp., RPM International, Inc., Ball Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Quintanilla v. Home Depot USA, Inc et al
as 7:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Quintanilla
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc and The Home Depot, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Richardson et al v. Home Depot Inc.
as 2:2023cv10560
Plaintiff:
Dr. Nekeyua Richardson and Christopher Westphal
Defendant:
Home Depot Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vaishnav v. Home Depot USA, Inc. et al

as 2:2023cv10532
Plaintiff:
Dhaval Vaishnav
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc., The Home Depot, Inc., Pingora Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Infogroup Inc. v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 9:2023cv80358
Counter Defendant:
Infogroup Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Office Depot Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Swarts v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Jason Swarts
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams v. Medical Depot, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Wilma Lee Adams
Defendant:
Medical Depot, Inc. doing business as Drive Devilbiss Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anastasio v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 1:2023cv10445
Plaintiff:
Michael Anastasio
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.