Cases 1 - 7 of 7
OPTIMUM CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. EMBASSY OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT
as 1:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
OPTIMUM CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
EMBASSY OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Optimum Construction, Inc. v. The Embassy of the Arab Republic of Egypt
as 8:2021cv02728
Plaintiff:
Optimum Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
The Embassy of the Arab Republic of Egypt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABDELKADER et al v. EMBASSY OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT
as 1:2016cv02004
Plaintiff:
SAYED HAGGAG AHMED ABDELKADER and CONCEPCION L ECUACION
Defendant:
EMBASSY OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Mohamed Lasheen v. Embassy of the Arab Republic o, et al
as 13-17143
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MOHAMED E. LASHEEN
Defendant - Appellant:
EMBASSY OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT, THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT and THE CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL BUREAU
Defendant:
THE LOOMIS COMPANY
Mohamed Lasheen v. Embassy of the Arab Republic o, et al
as 11-16249
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MOHAMED E. LASHEEN
Defendant - Appellant:
EMBASSY OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT, THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT and THE CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL BUREAU
Defendant:
THE LOOMIS COMPANY
Mohamed Lasheen v. Embassy of the Arab Republic o, et al
as 10-17034
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MOHAMED E. LASHEEN
Defendant - Appellant:
EMBASSY OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT, THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT and THE CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL BUREAU
Defendant:
THE LOOMIS COMPANY
Mohamed Lasheen v. United Payors and United Provi, et al
as 08-15486
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MOHAMED E. LASHEEN
Defendant:
UNITED PAYORS AND UNITED PROVIDERS and BCE EMERGIS, INC.,
Defendant-cross-defendant - Appellant:
EMBASSY OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT, THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT and THE CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL BUREAU
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee:
THE LOOMIS COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
