Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Adam Kestle v. The Litigation Practice Group PC
as 8:2023cv02119
Plaintiff: Adam Kestle
Defendant: The Litigation Practice Group PC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Marich Bein LLC v. The Litigation Practice Group, PC et al
as 8:2023cv00339
Plaintiff: Marich Bein LLC
Defendant: The Litigation Practice Group, PC and Oakstone Law Group PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00263
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00184
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NAZ II Holding, LLC v. The Litigation Practice Group PC et al
as 8:2023cv00030
Plaintiff: NAZ II Holding, LLC
Defendant: The Litigation Practice Group PC, Tony Diab, Validation Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07915
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01959
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Barton v. Litigation Practice Group PC et al
as 3:2022cv05483
Plaintiff: Nathen W Barton
Defendant: The Litigation Practice Group PC, Daniel S March, John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03101
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Craig Cunningham v. The Litigation Practices Group, PC et al
as 2:2022cv02423
Plaintiff: Craig Cunningham
Defendant: The Litigation Practices Group, PC, Daniel S. March, United Debt Consultants, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?