Cases 1 - 10 of 833,469
Cornerstone Chemical Company
as 1:2025cv00021
Plaintiff:
Cornerstone Chemical Company
Defendant:
United States
Camel Group Co., Ltd. v. United States et al
as 1:2025cv00022
Plaintiff:
Camel Group Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
United States, Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Beard v. United States of America
as 1:2025cv00092
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ray Beard
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2025cv00026
Plaintiff:
Wendy M M Williams
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McLeod v. Alabama, State of et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2025cv00062
Plaintiff:
Alexander J. McLeod
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Elmore Sand & Gravel, Inc.
as 2:2025cv00060
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Elmore Sand & Gravel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Pollutants & Permit Violations
Maze v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2025cv00183
Plaintiff:
Neal Maze
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ramos v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2025cv00093
Petitioner:
Jose Ramos
Respondent:
State of Connecticut, Connecticut Department of Correction and Connecticut Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
