Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Poe, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER POE, by and through his parents and next friends, Paula Poe and Patrick Poe, PAULA POE, PATRICK POE and others
Plaintiff:
DR. SHAUNA LAWLIS, on behalf of her patients
Defendant / Appellee:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, STEVEN KATSIS, M.D., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, TREVOR NUTT, in his official capacity as Vice-President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Johnson v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, New York State, Prisoner Legal Services of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyman v. Department of Defense et al
as 1:2020cv03059
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Federal Bureau of Investigation, State Of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Julian Lyman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. TMTE, Inc et al
as 1:2020mc00039
Defendant:
TMTE, Inc, Lucas Thomas Erb, Chase Metals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Office of the Attorney General and State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation, State of Texas, State of Florida and others
South Wind Women's Center, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 20-6045
Defendant / Appellant:
J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County, GARY COX, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY A. BURNS, D.O, on behalf of himself and his staff and his patients, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC., on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients and SOUTH WIND WOMEN'S CENTER LLC, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DBA Trust Women Oklahoma City
Amicus Curiae:
THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, FIFTY-FOUR MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA SENATE AND OKLAHOMA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY and others
303 Creative, et al v. Elenis, et al
as 19-1413
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY ARAGON, HEIDI HESS, MIGUEL RENE ELIAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORIE SMITH and 303 CREATIVE LLC, a limited liability company
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
Amicus Curiae:
CATO INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION, CATHOLICVOTE.ORG EDUCATION FUND and others
Colorado Outfitters, et al v. Hickenlooper
as 14-1290
Amicus Curiae:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION NETWORK, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLORADO FARM BUREAU, SPECIALTY SPORTS & SUPPLY, GOODS FOR THE WOODS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Governor of the State of Colorado
Beicker, et al v. Hickenlooper
as 14-1292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MINOR, Sheriff of Summit County, GABRIEL DAVID JOINER, Sheriff of Cheyenne County, TONY SPURLOCK, Sheriff of Douglas County and others
Amicus Curiae:
LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION NETWORK, STATE OF MARYLAND, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner:
LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Govenor of the State of Colorado
Maloy v. Zynex, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01011
Plaintiff:
Deahona Maloy , State of California, The, State of Connecticut, The and others
Defendant:
Zynex, Inc. and Zynex Medical, Inc
Interested_party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States, et al v. J-M Manufacturing, et al
as 13-1104
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELWARE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
J-M MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, U.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
