Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CACI, Inc. - Federal v. United States Navy
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
CACI Incorporated - Federal and CACI, Inc. - Federal
Defendant:
United States Navy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dancingbuck v. Haney et al
as 3:2017cv00660
Plaintiff:
Punalera Dancingbuck
Defendant:
William R. Haney, Jacelyn C. Dunstan, Barbara Gonzalex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holston v. United States Navy et al
as 1:2016cv00308
Plaintiff:
David Leroy Holston, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Navy and United States Department of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heap et al v. Hagel et al
as 1:2014cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jason Daniel Heap and The Humanist Society
Defendant:
Charles T. Hagel , Raymond E. Mabus, Jr. , William F. Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Heim v. Department of the United States Navy Recruiting Training Command
as 2:2013cv00701
Plaintiff:
Joshua Alan Heim
Defendant:
Department of the United States Navy Recruiting Training Command
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Astrop v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
Henry Lewis Astrop
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Navy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dixon v. United States Navy et al
as 2:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Dixon
Defendant:
United States Navy, U.S. Marines, John Does or others unnamed and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
