Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Adams et al v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02305
Plaintiff:
Nancy Cook, Marcelina Castaneda, John Andrews and others
Defendant:
McKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL INC., Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., Baxter Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Levin v. Bank of New York
as 17-3854
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Lucille Levin and Jeremy Levin
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon, Societe Generale and Citibank, N.A.
Third-Party-Defendant:
Sealed Third-Party Defendant, The Estate of James Silvia and Lynne Michol Spencer, Joseph A. Barile and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JP Morgan Chase, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Bank of New York, Societe Generale, Citibank and others
Estate of Stpehen B. Bland et al
as 1:2012mc00373
Plaintiff:
Estate of Stpehen B. Bland, Alan C. Anderson, Thelma Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Levin v. Bank of New York
as 11-623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Levin and Lucille Levin
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of New York, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Societe Generale Corporate & Investment Banking and others
Levin et al v. Bank of New York et al
as 11-623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeremy Levin and Lucille Levin
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of New York, JP Morgan Chase, Societe Generale and others
Anderson et al v. Vurshab
as 6:2009cv00558
Defendant:
Rajesh Vurshab and Rajesh Vurshab
Plaintiff:
Thelma Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Anderson
as 2:2007at00667
Plaintiff:
Thelma Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v Hickman, et al
as 2:2007cv01466
Plaintiff:
Thelma Anderson
Defendant:
Roderick Q. Hickman, James E. Tilton, Tom Felker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
