Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Payne v. Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan et al
as 2:2023cv10353
Plaintiff:
Shelly Ann-Marie Payne
Defendant:
Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan, Wayne County Friend of the Court, Benita M Cheatom and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
PARKER v. HAALAND et al
as 2:2022cv05049
Plaintiff:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER Moor Beneficiary a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in propria persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND d/b/a Debra Anne Haaland, secretary of the interior et al.,, MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND attorney general et al.,, ANDREW MARSHALL SAUL d/b/a ANDREW SAUL commissioner et al., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White #285964 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Kala White #285964
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of State Police, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Michigan, State of et al
as 3:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kala B. White
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, State of Michigan Department of State Police, State of Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dewberry v. Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan
as 2:2017cv12677
Plaintiff:
Ramirez D. Dewberry
Defendant:
Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan
Taft Lewis v. City of Romulus, et al
as 15-2270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAFT LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ROMULUS, ROMULUS POLICE DEPT, HUSSEIN FARHAT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv12353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv10090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
