Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Tiner v. El Paso County Detention Facility
as 6:2024cv00095
Defendant:
El Paso County Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiner v. Parole Board Austin Texas
as 6:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tiner
Defendant:
Parole Board Austin Texas, Henry LNU and Christi Agulair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiner v. Texas Parole Board et al
as 6:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tiner
Defendant:
Texas Parole Board, Greg Abbott, Erica Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiner v. Abbott et al
as 5:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tiner
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott, Sheriff Kelly Rowe, NFN NLN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiner v. Young, et al
as 5:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tiner
Defendant:
Cecile Young, Texas Health and Human Services, NFN 5:22-CV-208 Hamillton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tiner v. Lubbock County Detention Center
as 5:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tiner
Defendant:
Lubbock County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Tiner v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
as 20-50491
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS TINER
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tiner v. Collier
as 7:2020cv00118
Respondent:
Brad Collier
Petitioner:
Thomas Tiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tiner v. Collier
as 7:2020cv00119
Respondent:
Brad Collier
Petitioner:
Thomas Tiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tiner v. Moore et al
as 4:2020cv00394
Defendant:
Sgt Howard, Regional Directors of Wynne Unit and Sr. Warden Rocky Moore
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
