Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Franklin v. Talbert House Crisis et al
as 1:2025cv00078
Plaintiff:
Queen Charlotte Franklin
Defendant:
Talbert House Crisis, Chillicothe Correctional Inst. - Ross, N.A.A.C.P and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Buxbaum v. Walsh III

as 1:2025cv00689
Plaintiff:
Michael Buxbaum
Defendant:
Thomas Walsh III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Benitez Caceres et al v. Walsh et al
as 1:2025cv00002
Defendant:
Carline William, M.Beth Arudda, Thomas Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Mirca Benitez Caceres, Abraham Caceres, Guillermo Caceres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
WEISS v. POSNER et al
as 3:2024cv09659
Defendant:
JUDGE RONALD SUSSWEIN, DR. ANDREA KATZ, JUDGE HEIDI WILLIS CURRIER and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC S. WEISS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALSH v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03363
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
PAUL THOMAS WALSH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALSH v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as PAE/2:24-cv-03363
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
PAUL THOMAS WALSH, JR.
Covial v. Francillion et al

as 1:2024cv04817
Defendant:
City of New York, Thomas Walsh, Thomas Gugliome and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon A. Covial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Covial v. Francillion et al

as 1:2024cv03125
Plaintiff:
Brandon A. Covial
Defendant:
Marvin Francillion, Ashley Duncan-Peters, Chris Budhan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Judge Ana Reyes, Judge Christopher Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.