Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00115
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BOWEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv06550
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EUNICE THOMAS BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowen v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00253
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bowen
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Unknown:
Billy J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Thomas Bowen v. USDC-CASD
as 14-71413
:
In re: THOMAS BOWEN
Petitioner:
THOMAS BOWEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Real Party In Interest:
DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Thomas Bowen v. Director of California Departm
as 14-55372
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS BOWEN
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Thomas Bowen v. Director of California Dept of Corrections
as 3:2013cv01606
Petitioner:
Thomas Bowen
Respondent:
Director of California Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Bowen v. Director of California Dept of Corrections
as 5:2013cv01084
Petitioner:
Thomas Bowen
Respondent:
Director of California Dept of Corrections
Fenzel v. Group2 Software, LLC et al
as 8:2013cv00379
Plaintiff:
Jerry Fenzel
Defendant:
Group2 Software, LLC and Thomas Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bowens v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22048
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bowens
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cadle Company v. Bowen et al
as 2:2012cv00164
Plaintiff:
Cadle Company
Defendant:
Alfred Bowen, Valerie M Littlechief, Dustin Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
