Cases 11 - 20 of 150
Smith v. Dickhaut
as 15-1770
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES J. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
Jones v. Gelb, et al
as 15-1680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, The Commisioner of the Department of Correction (DOC), THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent of S.B.C.C, ROBBY R. DOBB, The Liutenant at S.B.C.C and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE GELB, Former Deputy Superintendent of Operation at S.B.C.C, JOE FREITAS, The Lieutenant at MCI, CJ, MICHAEL D. FARLEY, The Sergeant at S.B.C.C and others
Evans v. Mendonsa, et al
as 15-1310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY MENDONSA, Superintendent, THOMAS DICKHAUT, Former Superintendent and CHARLES KING
Defendant:
MARLENE DODGE, Health Service Administrator SBCC, CARMEN NEWLY and ANGELA D'ANTONIO, Nurse Practitioner SBCC
Carr v. Colon, et al
as 14-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODOLFO CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM COLON, MARLON MEDERO, KEVIN FOUNTAINE and others
Defendant:
BONNIE WERNER, HAROLD W. CLARKE, LUIS SPENCER and others
Nom et al v. Medeiros et al
as 1:2014cv13440
Plaintiff:
Sarourt Nom, Sophea Eang, Souvanheung Pachansiri and others
Defendant:
Sean Medeiros, Bruce Pires, Sherry Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordero v. Dickhaut et al
as 1:2014cv13553
Plaintiff:
Alex Cordero
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Bruce Gelb, Mark Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacks v. Spencer et al
as 1:2014cv13072
Plaintiff:
James Jacks
Defendant:
Luis Spencer, Thomas Dickhaut, James Saba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Dickhaut
as 14-1626
Petitioner - Appellant:
KASHMONI MURPHY
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
Gendreau v. Dickhaut
as 14-1476
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND GENDREAU
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
