Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 150
Moore v. Dickhaut We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1400
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY MOORE
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
Rasheed v. D'Antonio, et al
as 14-1220
Plaintiff - Appellant: RASHAD AKEEM RASHEED
Defendant - Appellee: ANGELA D'ANTONIO, MARLENE DODGE, DYANA NICKL and others
In re: Jones, et al
as 14-1168
Petitioner: ANTONIO JONES
Respondent: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commisioner of the Department of Corrections, BRUCE GELB, former Deputy Superintendent of Operation at S.B.C.C., THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent of S.B.C.C. and others
Mosher v. Dickhaut
as 13-1863
Petitioner - Appellant: MARK R. MOSHER
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
Carr v. Colon, et al
as 13-1695
Plaintiff - Appellant: RODOLFO CARR
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM COLON, MARLON MEDERO, KEVIN FONTAINE and others
Defendant: BONNIE WERNER, HAROLD W. CLARKE, LUIS SPENCER and others
Pena v. Dickhaut We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1193
Petitioner - Appellant: YODERNY PENA
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
LeBaron v. Meal Mart, et al
as 13-1073
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATHAN MARQUIS LEBARON
Defendant - Appellee: MEAL MART, MEAL MART OWNERS, UNKNOWN MEAL MART EMPLOYEES and others
Interested Party: DARRON J. SHEROKOW, KEVIN ASHBY, NICHOLAS BASEY and others
Rasheed v. D'Antonio, et al
as 12-2327
Plaintiff - Appellant: RASHAD AKEEM RASHEED
Defendant - Appellee: ANGELA D'ANTONIO, MARLENE DODGE, DYANA NICKI and others
Defendant: D. J. HAGER
Snell, Jr. v. George, et al
as 12-2046
Plaintiff - Appellant: EMORY G. SNELL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: ANTHONY GEORGE, EDWARD FICCO, THOMAS DICKHAUT and others
Smith v. Dickhaut We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv30120
Petitioner: James J. Smith
Respondent: Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?