Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 150
Cryer v. UMass Medical, et al
as 12-1397
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEREK SINCERE BLACK WOLF CRYER
Defendant - Appellee: UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM, TERRE K. MARSHALL, Director of Health Services, DYANA NICKI and others
: JOHN DIAZ
Miller v. Spencer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv10504
Plaintiff: David Miller
Defendant: Luis Spencer, Thomas Dickhaut and Christopher Hyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aviles v. Dickhaut We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv40017
Plaintiff: Angel Aviles
Defendant: Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salameh v. Duval et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv10165
Plaintiff: Nadeem Salameh
Defendant: Ronald Duval, Luis Spencer, Thomas Dickhaut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serrano v. Dickhaut We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv40012
Petitioner: Benjamin Serrano
Respondent: Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rise v. Dickhaut
as 12-1158
Petitioner - Appellant: PHILLIP RISE
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT
DeLong v. Dickhaut We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1131
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSEPH DELONG
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
Fletcher v. Mendonsa
as 12-1059
Petitioner - Appellant: DENNIS FLETCHER
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent of Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
LaPorte v. Dickhaut
as 3:2011cv30284
Petitioner: Florencio LaPorte
Respondent: Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barbosa Jr v. Dickhaut et al
as 1:2011cv12332
Plaintiff: Joao Pedro Barbosa Jr
Defendant: Thomas Dickhaut, Anthony Medonsa and Brian Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?