Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 150
Murphy v. Dickhaut
as 11-1133
Petitioner - Appellant: KASHMONI MURPHY
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT
Rivera v. Dickhaut We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv10237
Petitioner: Pablo Rivera, Jr.
Respondent: Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cordero v. Dickhaut et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv10098
Plaintiff: Alex Cordero
Defendant: Thomas Dickhaut , Osvaldo Vidal and Anthony Mendonsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Dickhaut et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv40004
Plaintiff: Rico Perry
Defendant: Thomas Dickhaut, Anthony Mendonsa, Terrance J. Fougere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosher v. Dickhaut We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv12173
Petitioner: Mark R. Mosher
Respondent: Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeLong v. Dickhaut
as 10-2417
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSEPH DELONG
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT
Sires v. Hefferman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv11993
Plaintiff: William S. Sires
Defendant: Mary Elizabeth Hefferman, Harold W. Clarke, James Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hennessy v. Clarke, et al
as 10-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDMUND HENNESSY
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOUZA-BARANOWSKI CORRECTIONAL CENTER, MCI-SHIRLEY MEDIUM and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN DENNEHY, HAROLD W. CLARKE, LOIS A. RUSSO and others
Abernathy v. Dickhaut, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv11504
Plaintiff: Franklin B. Abernathy
Defendant: Thomas Dickhaut, Anthony Mendonsa, Robert J. Blood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haliday v. Dickhaut, et al
as 10-1980
Petitioner - Appellant: KEVIN D. HALIDAY
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT and MARTHA COAKLEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?